Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-17-2025
Publisher
Springer Nature
Abstract
Prior research suggests that the effectiveness of retrieval practice may be moderated by response format: overt retrieval (e.g., typing a response) outperforms covert retrieval (e.g., mentally recalling a response) for complex materials like definitions, but both forms of retrieval are equally effective for simple materials like single words. These differences are explained by the retrieval dynamics hypothesis, which posits that retrieving a single unit of information is relatively automatic and easy, while retrieving multiple interconnected units (e.g., definitions) is more demanding and may not be exhaustive when done covertly. In two experiments, undergraduates studied either key terms or definitions of declarative concepts and practiced via overt retrieval, covert retrieval, or restudy. Two days later, students completed a criterion test on either the key terms or definitions. Results supported the retrieval dynamics hypothesis: performance was higher for overt compared to covert retrieval, with a larger advantage for definitions than key terms. Both retrieval formats outperformed restudy. These findings suggest that overt retrieval practice is particularly beneficial for learning demanding material, whereas covert retrieval may be more efficient, though less thorough. Future research should explore methods to enhance the effectiveness of covert retrieval. Until then, we recommend students prioritize overt retrieval when mastering complex information.
Recommended Citation
Rivers, M. L., Northern, P. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2025). Does Retrieval Demand Moderate the Effectiveness of Covert Retrieval Practice? Comparing Covert and Overt Retrieval Practice for Learning Key Terms and Definitions. Educational Psychology Review, 37(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10040-4
Comments
Open access to this article is funded by Santa Clara University Library.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.