Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-8-2025
Publisher
Springer Nature
Abstract
Purpose
Cancer survivors in a state with no legal access to cannabis may be hesitant to discuss their cannabis use with providers, particularly in light of legal consequences which disproportionately affect certain racial groups. This study examined potential racial disparities in the relationship of cannabis use status with patient-provider discussions of and attitudes toward cannabis in a state where there is no legal cannabis marketplace.
Methods
Survivors of cancer (N = 1003, Mage = 62.36; 13% Black/African-American; 41% male) completed a cross-sectional survey. Weight-adjusted regressions examined racial differences in the relationship between cannabis use status with (a) comfort and discussion of cannabis with providers, and (b) beliefs about impact of legalization on patients’ and providers’ comfort discussing cannabis.
Results
No racial differences were observed in rates of cannabis use or discussion, and patients who used cannabis were more comfortable discussing cannabis. Black patients who had used cannabis reported the greatest comfort discussing cannabis with providers, but also the greatest perceived improvement in comfort in the event of legalization.
Conclusions
Results highlight comfort and willingness to discuss cannabis with cancer care providers, particularly among Black patients who already use cannabis, which was not the hypothesized direction of findings. Further work is needed to inform recommendations for provider-led communication about cannabis.
Recommended Citation
Wedel, A. V., Walters, K. J., Tomko, R. L., Rojewski, A. M., & McClure, E. A. (2025). Evaluating racial disparities in cancer patient-provider communication about cannabis in a state without a legal cannabis marketplace. Supportive Care in Cancer, 33(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09131-9
Comments
Open access to this article is funded by Santa Clara University Library.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.