Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-4-2019
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Abstract
Previous work studying social comparisons suggests that people are likely to assimilate to ingroup members (e.g. Ledgerwood & Chaiken, 2007) but can also contrast from ingroup members if outgroup members are present (Blanton, Miller, & Dye, 2002). The present research built upon these findings by including a no-comparison control group to test for true contrast and assimilation effects. Across two studies, women primed with a gender-math stereotype received false feedback about their performance on a math task; and in some conditions, they learned of the performance of ostensible male and/or female co-participants. Relative to a no-comparison control, we did not see evidence of ingroup assimilation in either study. However, in both studies, we found that participants were likely to contrast their self-evaluations away from downward targets, regardless of group membership. This suggests that self-enhancement motivations may be stronger than the drive for ingroup assimilation.
Recommended Citation
Bruchmann, K., & Evans, M. C. (2019). Comparing to ingroup and outgroup members: Do we assimilate, contrast, or neither? The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1472546
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology on May 3, 2019], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00224545.2018.1472546.