Document Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

2013

Publisher

Bloomsbury Academic

Abstract

Did Socrates have a metaphysics? The question is complex. We might begin by asking, what is a metaphysics? We might also ask, who we mean by Socrates? Let me deal with these questions in order. Metaphysics is concerned with what lies at the foundation of things, the principles underlying reality. ln this essay, that will mean primarily an ontology, a theory of 'what there is'. Now one point on which the authors discussed in this article agree, a 'point of departure' that anchors their various views about Socratic metaphysics, is that Plato had a metaphysics: as Gregory Vlastos puts it, 'a grandiose theory of "separately existing" Forms' (Vlastos 1991: 48). 1 This ontology is found in the Phaedo, Symposium and Republic. Our authors agree further that the Platonic Forms are universals, causes, paradigms or standards, and in some sense self-predicational ('the Form of F itself is F'). Given this level of agreement on Platonic metaphysics, we can ask three questions about Socratic metaphysics: Did Socrates espouse Platonic metaphysics? Did he espouse some predecessor to Platonic metaphysics? Or was Socrates 'innocent' of metaphysics?

Chapter of

The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates

Editor

John Bussanich
Nicholas Smith

Comments

Copyright © 2013 Bloomsbury Publishing Inc. Reprinted with permission.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.