Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2014
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Abstract
This study investigates the roles of bank and trade credits in a supply chain with a capital-constrained retailer facing demand uncertainty. We evaluate the retailer's optimal order quantity and the creditors' optimal credit limits and interest rates in two scenarios. In the single-credit scenario, we find the retailer prefers trade credit, if the trade credit market is more competitive than the bank credit market; otherwise, the retailer's preference of a specific credit type depends on the risk levels that the retailer would divert trade credit and bank credit to other risky investments. In the dual-credit scenario, if the bank credit market is more competitive than the trade credit market, the retailer first borrows bank credit prior to trade credit, but then switches to borrowing trade credit prior to bank credit as the retailer's internal capital declines. In contrast, if the trade credit market is more competitive, the retailer borrows only trade credit. We further analytically prove that the two credits are complementary if the retailer's internal capital is substantially low but become substitutable as the internal capital grows, and then empirically validate this prediction based on a panel of 674 firms in China over the period 2001–2007.
Recommended Citation
Cai, G. (George), Chen, X., & Xiao, Z. (2014). The Roles of Bank and Trade Credits: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12035
Comments
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Cai, G. (George), Chen, X., & Xiao, Z. (2014). The Roles of Bank and Trade Credits: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence. Production and Operations Management, 23(4), 583–598, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12035. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.