Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2019

Abstract

Non-constituent donors constitute an increasingly important fundraising base for members of the House. These donors are theorized to be seeking “surrogate representation” by buying additional representation rather than relying solely upon representation provided by their own House members. However, precisely why they contribute in this way remains unclear. Using data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies (CCES) 2008- 2014 in a series of logistic models, I investigate whether self-reported donors make contributions to House races outside of their home states for policy or partisan reasons. I uncover evidence that surrogate seekers make their out-of-state contributions to recover partisan representation and to gain additional partisan and policy representation. Further, conservative issue stances significantly increase the likelihood of out-of-state giving more so than liberal stances suggesting conservative donors have less difficulty identifying surrogate representatives. Taken together, the results suggest surrogate seekers are strategic and politically sophisticated with respect to their giving choices and motivations.

Comments

Please do not cite without permission.

This paper will be forthcoming in Political Behavior.

District Count Variable 1_1_2019.do (13 kB)
District Count Variable

Models 1_14_2019 BakerAE Out of State Donors.do (5 kB)
Models 1-14-2019 Out of State Donors

Variables 1_14_2019 BakerAE Out of State Donors.do (13 kB)
Variables 1-14-2019 Out of State Donors

Available for download on Friday, January 15, 2021

Share

COinS